<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Cram it in</title> <atom:link href="http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/</link> <description>the web and I</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/comment-page-1/#comment-6959</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:14:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/#comment-6959</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;That is a challenge! It may require re-arranging or duplicating the content. Give me some time to think about that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;q&gt;I see direct urls (using #id) work, very nice. Although they don’t select the right number…&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have removed the updated URLs (for now), it causes a distracting skip in most browsers tested (only Chrome handled it cleanly). If only there was a way to prevent the browser from re-drawing the window while a couple of lines of JavaScript are executed!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;q&gt;Will it automatically transition if left idle? &lt;/q&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s certainly on the road-map, with a pause button for accessibility. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback, and the challenge!&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a challenge! It may require re-arranging or duplicating the content. Give me some time to think about that.</p><p><q>I see direct urls (using #id) work, very nice. Although they don’t select the right number…</q></p><p>I have removed the updated URLs (for now), it causes a distracting skip in most browsers tested (only Chrome handled it cleanly). If only there was a way to prevent the browser from re-drawing the window while a couple of lines of JavaScript are executed!</p><p><q>Will it automatically transition if left idle? </q></p><p>That&#8217;s certainly on the road-map, with a pause button for accessibility. <img
src='http://irama.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Thanks for the feedback, and the challenge!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/comment-page-1/#comment-6952</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 10:24:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://irama.org/news/2008/09/13/cram-it-in/#comment-6952</guid> <description>Looking good :)
I have a challenge for you... I&#039;d like to see the sliding animation simulate &quot;wrap around&quot; and sliding from one item to another should take the &quot;shortest&quot; route.
There are 5 items in the demo. If you are viewing #4 and pick #1, it slides &quot;back&quot; (left to right) skipping over #3 and #2 quickly. If it slid forwards (right to left) it would skip #5 only... that&#039;s &quot;shortest&quot; ;)
Alternatively you could reserve sliding for transitions between adjacent items (it&#039;s still implement a slide between the last and first items), and just do an instant toggle for a direct click.
I see direct urls (using #id) work, very nice. Although they don&#039;t select the right number... but I&#039;m sure that&#039;s under development.
Will it automatically transition if left idle?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking good <img
src='http://irama.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>I have a challenge for you&#8230; I&#8217;d like to see the sliding animation simulate &#8220;wrap around&#8221; and sliding from one item to another should take the &#8220;shortest&#8221; route.</p><p>There are 5 items in the demo. If you are viewing #4 and pick #1, it slides &#8220;back&#8221; (left to right) skipping over #3 and #2 quickly. If it slid forwards (right to left) it would skip #5 only&#8230; that&#8217;s &#8220;shortest&#8221; <img
src='http://irama.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Alternatively you could reserve sliding for transitions between adjacent items (it&#8217;s still implement a slide between the last and first items), and just do an instant toggle for a direct click.</p><p>I see direct urls (using #id) work, very nice. Although they don&#8217;t select the right number&#8230; but I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s under development.</p><p>Will it automatically transition if left idle?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
